Sport Rugby (league)

Decisions under fire

Written by James Potter

The opening game of State of Origin 2012 took place in Melbourne last week. It was a tough, low scoring affair that was marred by controversy.

One of the great things about rugby league is that very few penalties are given. This allows the game to flow quickly, and leaves both fans and players less infuriated by overly officious whistle-blowers. Game 1 of the State of Origin saw the unlucky losing team, NSW, bleeding after some very interesting decisions.

Rugby League referees co-coach Bill Harrigan faced the media the day after the game. He claimed the Inglis try which caused so much controversy was awarded fairly, and that all in all, his boys did a good job. Bill was the the best whistle-blower I have ever seen in sport, and I agree with his review of the try.

As sport becomes more professional, video refs become more involved in the game. I don’t have a problem with this – sport is a big business, and it’s important to obtain clear results in matches.

What I don’t agree with is the rule. After all, the referees don’t make up the rules, they just enforce them. Short of attacking a player’s head, a defender should be able to do anything in their power to stop an opponent scoring a try. Robbie Farah did what any player would do and there is no way the try should ever have been allowed. Fix the rules – don’t hang the referees.

I’m James Potter and I’m pulling no punches.